>>>>>>Then there was sex education (someday I hope that someone plots a timeline that correlates promiscuity with public school sex education)
>>>>>
>>>>>In fact, the better the sex education in a state, the lower the teen pregnancy rate:
>>>>>
>>>>>
http://thinkprogress.org/health/2013/03/01/1640851/states-teen-pregnancy-rates/>>>>>
>>>>>Tamar
>>>>
>>>>That's an interesting study, but I said promiscuity, not pregnancy.
>>>
>>>So in the states with no sex education, you get higher teen pregnancy rate, but it's OK as it's mostly monogamous?
>>
>>That's not what I meant to imply.
>>I just wonder whether there is any correlation between sex education and promiscuity, one way or the other.
>
>Well, it tends to raise the age at which teenagers have their first sexual encounter.
http://aspeneducation.crchealth.com/factsheetindex/factsheetpromiscuity/This study shows that "During the past three decades, the level of sexual activity in adolescents in the United States has increased.” (Source, American Academy of Pediatrics)
As I recall, sex education in schools began during the late 60's or so.
Anyone who does not go overboard- deserves to.
Malcolm Forbes, Sr.