>>Again, that is all fine and good if there's a level of consistency. But when there's a pattern of aggressively challenging certain sources - and taking other sources (usually formal authority figures) with such high faith....
If this is how you characterize a response to your calling Obama a liar: all you need do is provide stats or figures to support the pronouncements. Check the post to which you initially responded, for a sample.
"... They ne'er cared for us
yet: suffer us to famish, and their store-houses
crammed with grain; make edicts for usury, to
support usurers; repeal daily any wholesome act
established against the rich, and provide more
piercing statutes daily, to chain up and restrain
the poor. If the wars eat us not up, they will; and
there's all the love they bear us."
-- Shakespeare: Coriolanus, Act 1, scene 1
