>Going to use a bit of the Socratic method here:
>
>This is a blind baseball analysis. Three pitchers in MLB: Pitcher A, B, and C (all three with at least one Cy Young each, all three with at least one Series ring each)
>
>Statistics attached in the JPG file. For the three pitchers, I've listed career regular season and post-season W/L record, ERA, K/B ratio, WHIP, etc.
>
>Here's the question - not knowing the actual names, if you were to rank the three pitchers for Hall of Fame voting (first most likely, second, third), how would you rank them.
>
>I know that Mike B and Alan P and Tamar G are the baseball fans here, so I'm sure they'll weigh in.

C, B, A

I recognize C as Greg Maddux and B as Tom Glavine based on the number of wins. No doubt in my mind that they both deserved to be voted in the first time around. 300 or more wins more or less guarantees election to the HOF.

My guess is you think player A is more deserving than one or both of the others. If so, why? I don't immediately recognize who he is. The stats are similar to the others other than the wide disparity in number of wins. I consider strikeouts and ratio of strikeouts to walks essentially meaningless statistics. It doesn't matter how you get them out as long as you get them out.