General information
Category:
Coding, syntax & commands
Environment versions
Network:
Windows 2008 Server
From following these threads, the only issue I can see that might arise with vartype() is that a variable might sneak in that is blank - apart from that, the values are guaranteed to be either C or N since I select the scope - so if I understand correctly adding a provision to deal with 'X' would cover all my bases. Correct?
k
>Added for speed was vartype(), which sometimes barfs where slower Type() works. returning wrong resulst I have not witnessed, it had the "X" for .null. as difference
>>
>>Beware, do not use TYPE(). It was added for speed but makes little difference and is known for returning the wrong result at times. I have seen this myself.
Previous
Next
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only