>>>As Nixon and others have learned, it's not the deed that'll get you, it's the cover-up. It'll be interesting to see what the evidence is.
>>>
>>
>>I have a problem with someone (Wildstein) speaking through a lawyer (weeks afterwards, after taking the fifth) with the declaration, "I have evidence"
>>If he had it, spit it out. (And maybe he does)
>
>Speculation is that he's angling for a deal.
>
>Tamar

I was actually about to post that. The letter talked about Wildstein's legal fees w/respect to the Port Authority.

The NYT had to dial it back a notch....their online version initially reported this as "they have the evidence", and then stated later that "evidence exists".

None of this makes Christie innocent - I still find it hard to believe a governor would not know about the lane closures until after they were open.