>>>Yes, it seems ethics, duty, and justice is entirely inconsequential to your lust for rich people's blood.
>
>LOL. Imagine that I see a missing manhole on the street and point out that a bad accident is going to happen. According you, I'm lusting after blood?


Hardly.

Everyday millions of people pay more for a cup of coffee at starbucks than the price of several loafs of bread.

Thats a fact.

Are we starving? No. We waste ridiculous amounts of food.

Most Americans have weight problems.

Who says "let them eat cake" today? Where is this modern day Antoinette you refer to?

On Wednesday 700'000 people filled the streets of Seattle to celebrate the Seahawks who paraded down mainstreet with their billionare owner Paul Allen.

From what I could estimate, in jerseys worn by fans alone represented $50 Million. For what? Fan clothing.

I dont see them running out bread.

Are there people starving in the world?

Yes.

Does giving Americans more disposable income solve that.

No.

Are there people in the world that write books and make money from the idea we are all screwed?

Yes.

Does thinking things are horrible all the time eventually adversely affect the situation.

Yes.

You see a pothole, and without putting something over it, you say soneones gonna get hurt because so and so did this and theres going to be a huge problem.

I see a man on the corner ranting about a pothole that everyone has caused by years of use.


>Nope. Somebody who wants the accident to happen would say nothing and stand by with iPhone ready to video the carnage.
>
>For your benefit:
>
>First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out-- Because I was not a Socialist.
>
>Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out-- Because I was not a Trade Unionist.
>
>Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out-- Because I was not a Jew.
>
>Then they came for me--and there was no one left to speak for me.
>
>If that's your recipe, we can agree to disagree.