>UT policies state:
>"We will reject an account during the approval process for any reason we judge satisfactory, such as:
>
> A fake account
>...
> An account that is used as a false or double identity"
>
>IIRC member#078340 once posted that his name was not his real, professional identity but an alias which in his native language sounds friendly, but is not harsh like "Harsh".
>
>Kevin was banned on your suspicion or him using a second, false alias - despite Kevin posting a lot of useful stuff in technical sections, providing food for thought in Chatter and Kevin always and repeatedly stating that the second alias - false or not - was not used by him, even after being re-allowed back in.
>
>If my recollection is correct and that individual does not use his real name, I personally think at least the same consequences Kevin faced should apply. "At least" because in such a case there is not only a suspicion, based on how much undeniable, but still circumstantial evidence, but confessed truth about the facts,
>***and***
>the amount of help asked vs. given by those individuals.
>
>Such decisions are of course totally in your court.

Sometimes, we may not see the account. So, only when I become aware of it, I can verify. In that case, I believe I did. Harsh confirmed again in this thread that this is is real name.