>>If someone does not believe in God and any moral standards, but instead in evolution, he does not need to worry, because since people that are born homosexual do not contribute to the survival of the race would be eradicated after some time in the evolution process.
>
>Not necessarily. Perhaps the genetic benefit is a not too narrow set of stimuli for arousal - making certain cetrain than offspring will follow even if less than wonderful pickings are available. There is homosexual behavior in animal kingdom as well. And why should anyone believing in evolution care ? (As long as personal space is not invaded when one does not like it?)

That's what I said, if someone believes in evolution he would not need to care. And if there is no offspring, it would vanish automatically over time. I haven't seen any offspring (as yet) following from homosexual activity. If there is a homosexual gene it has very little to now chance to survive the evolution process. So it still has to be proven that someone is born like that, not that it really matters but it should not be used as an argument.