>Like Hugo, I disagree with this decision, not because I agree with Rick, but because of the way the rules are changed to apparently suit those who could not bring themselves to just not read the "offending" posts and could not prevent themselves from further arguing and debating them.
>
>I understand what happened on Foxite - the posts were intermingled with technical posts so you were confronted with them unknowingly and unexpectedly. I agree that is not acceptable. But this is not what happened on the UT where a specific category was created, a specific rule made about it, and that rule was adhered to. From that point it became our own inability to just ignore it, not read it, and move on which would have ended it by itself due to a lack of feedback.
>
>In addition, isn't this why the twit filter was developed? People could easily have used that option and problem totally solved.
>
>The UT must decide what it wants to be. A technical forum? - great, fantastic, then make it pure technical like FoxWIki.

Well stated and precisely in line with my POV.