>Michel runs UT as a business, not some bastion of free speech. As BDFL he's had a fairly light
>hand on the tiller, AFAICR intervening only when things have gotten seriously out of hand and/or
>damaging to his bottom line.


There's an expression often used in cases like this: "Count the costs"

Costs run both ways, for and against, and one of those ways invariably costs exceedingly more than the other.


>If anyone disagrees with Michel's decision to ban religion content on this forum, they're free to
>contact him and tell him they will not be renewing their subscriptions. If those outnumber the
>other ones who knows, maybe it will be reinstated.