>>>>>>Michel runs UT as a business, not some bastion of free speech. As BDFL he's had a fairly light
>>>>>>hand on the tiller, AFAICR intervening only when things have gotten seriously out of hand and/or
>>>>>>damaging to his bottom line.
>>>>>There's an expression often used in cases like this: "Count the costs"
>>>>>Costs run both ways, for and against
>>>>True.
>>>>>and one of those ways invariably costs exceedingly more than the other.
>>>>In your opinion, which as I've already said is of no consequence in this situation.
>>>This is not my opinion. And this is a completely untrue statement.
>>
>>Do you own the UT?
>
>No.

The owner has already made a decision in this matter. Your opinion of the costs of that decision is of no consequence. QED.