I don't have a subscription, so I have no standing to complain, but if your hope is to continue to proselytize in a manner that you hope gets around the rules, I hope that you are removed. It is tiresome and ridiculous.

Allowing you to chase off good technical knowledge-bearers while at the same time just flat out pissing off the rest of us is intolerable. If you disappear, I will buy a subscription.



>>>>>>>>Michel runs UT as a business, not some bastion of free speech. As BDFL he's had a fairly light
>>>>>>>>hand on the tiller, AFAICR intervening only when things have gotten seriously out of hand and/or
>>>>>>>>damaging to his bottom line.
>>>>>>>There's an expression often used in cases like this: "Count the costs"
>>>>>>>Costs run both ways, for and against
>>>>>>True.
>>>>>>>and one of those ways invariably costs exceedingly more than the other.
>>>>>>In your opinion, which as I've already said is of no consequence in this situation.
>>>>>This is not my opinion. And this is a completely untrue statement.
>>>>
>>>>Do you own the UT?
>>>
>>>No.
>>
>>The owner has already made a decision in this matter. Your opinion of the costs of that decision is of no consequence. QED.
>
>
>Again, it's not my opinion. And my statement stands.