>>>I am not in agreement with that opinion and I don't think it's really appropriate to post that since the person to whom it applies cannot reply. For Rick, his belief is beyond reproach and therefore he will choose that over anything else, every time. He was challenged to remove his signature and that for him, realizing that request would be enforced, was enough to say "adios". For him to have removed it would have been a choice of a forum rule over what he believes and hence that challenge resulted in a totally predictable outcome the minute it was posted.
>>
>>Nope.
>>
>>message#1597627
>>
>>What do you think he was heading for? Knowing his behaviour?
>>
>
>Yes, but at that message he had not broken the rules ... yet. Or are we playing Minority Report :)
>
>
>>Does he give in a bit?
>>No. Just prayers and sins.
>>
>>He does not to be want to be valued as one can value him. Go back and look how many have tried. And yes, I value his tech knowlege.
>>I respect his believes but this is something I can not say about him. Beg your pardon, but I can't stand this.
>
>Then the easy solution is the twit filter. Works perfectly.

Somehow my english does not work well.

That would have blocked his tech message as well. (O.K. now it it ends up the same, but this was not intended)

And no, this is not my style. He might be stubborn but no twit.