From the hip - differences in the path the project housed in, debug info or the impressum part might be the culprit here.
You could try out different parameters in these, but as the problematic system is fixed, I see no real benefit for the effort as testing might be futile. And runnning the old exe possibly but not really probable housing a virus is not that high on my things to do b4 everyting else ;-)



>The exes are slightly different in size, mine is some 100 bytes longer.
>
>If have byte compared the both exes.
>There are differnces in byte code.
>
>Do you have an idea where to search for the version, that what we see with VERSION(4)?
>
>Lutz
>
>>As the OP's machine seems to be working after some AV-cleaning such tendencies dropped even more - not a direction I want to branch out ;-)
>>If the OP exe is identical in size to your exe and only few bytes differ (timestamps, moved paths) it probaly only was a glitch fixed now.
>>
>>
>>>Hm, that is a way too. But I do not have ReFox since I never had a need for it.
>>>He has included the exe in his zip. I have not unpacked it. Do like to test?
>>>
>>>Lutz
>>>
>>>>probably better to provide the exe and check via decompilation that nothing was added via pjxhook or virus - no need to run the exe itself.
>>>>then build an exe from your clean system, send back and compare results, so as to not endanger your HW (unless you have a test VM)