Regarding CAs, do you use something like Stonefield to distribute updates? Does stonefield work well w/ CAs?

>I've skiped the use of views and switched to cursor adapters. Easier to maintain. No need to bloat the DBC with views. (Every change of a view will increase DBC size)
>Easy to change a code pattern with a patch. A change of a DBC is more tricky.
>From the CA's events one can follow the command VFP uses to insert, delete etc.
>
>Anyway, I go AFK now. Midnight's to close. :)
>
>>Ugh, that was it. When i saw that field name i cringed a bit. Thanks for your help. It got me looking at the SQL and then the table def itself.