>>>>>>>I believe message#1597634 is a violation of the recently amended terms & conditions of this site.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I figured that would happen sooner or later but I have to admit I didn't think it would be in a thread titled "Religion content to be forbidden from Universal Thread" ...
>>>>>
>>>>>No kidding.
>>>>
>>>>Seems clear he chose to be banned. My take is he wanted to be a martyr to the cause.
>>>>
>>>>Tamar
>>>
>>>I stand corrected. Up until now I was under the impression the rules were being adhered to.
>>
>>They were, he did. He was asked to remove his signature on (unspoken but obvious) threat of being banned for breaking the "rules" on religious posts. For him he could not avoid replying - from his mind-set / position that was not an option. He could no longer reply in the religion section since that section was now removed/blocked. Therefore, he had to reply directly in the same thread which obviously was not in the religion section. Then he was banned.
>>
>>I know the religion of many of the members here. They post, often in subtle and maybe unconscious ways, their religious affiliations. Whether this is on purpose or not is irrelevant - they do it. Ban them.
>
>Religion isn't what got him banned.
>
>http://xkcd.com/1357/

I agree with the cartoon but I did not say religion got him banned. Writing a religious post after the no-religion rule came into effect got him banned. I did not suggest otherwise. However, now that the rule is in effect (thank Godot) we can dispense with all "religious" content.