Plateforme Level Extreme
Abonnement
Profil corporatif
Produits & Services
Support
Légal
English
FLOCK and Unique Sales Numbers
Message
De
24/06/2014 09:39:44
 
Information générale
Forum:
Visual FoxPro
Catégorie:
Codage, syntaxe et commandes
Versions des environnements
Visual FoxPro:
VFP 9 SP1
OS:
Windows XP SP3
Network:
Windows 2003 Server
Database:
Visual FoxPro
Application:
Desktop
Divers
Thread ID:
01602280
Message ID:
01602286
Vues:
39
>Hi Gang!
>
>We used to have a record in a table for EACH lane of a drug store (each register, that is). Each record had a field to track the sales number for THAT register (lane). So, you could have multiple duplicate sales numbers in the drug store over a period of time.
>
>They didn't like that ( I didn't either ), so I was tasked to code up a solution so there would be UNIQUE sales numbers at that location (store). The registerrs would no longer look at the previous table, but would call a function to get a UNIQUE sales number for the store at THAT MOMENT in time. Here is what I came up with, ...
>
>SET REPROCESS TO AUTO is globally set at the beginning of the program.....
>
>
>FUNCTION GetNextSaleNumber
>LOCAL lnNextSaleNumber
>
>IF NOT USED('sales_no')
>	USE IN 0 sales_no
>ENDIF 
>*Lock the sales_no table to allow no one else to modifiy the last_sale value while I am updating it....
>IF FLOCK('sales_no')
>	SELECT sales_no
>	IF sales_no.last_sale = 999999
>		REPLACE sales_no.last_sale WITH 1
>	ELSE 
>		REPLACE sales_no.last_sale WITH sales_no.last_sale + 1
>	ENDIF 
>	lnNextSaleNumber = sales_no.last_sale
>ELSE
>	lnNextSaleNumber = -1	 
>ENDIF
>SELECT sales_no
>UNLOCK    
>RETURN lnNextSaleNumber
>
>
>Sales_no is a simple table with ONE record and ONE field in it. ( sales_no.last_sale ).
>
>And you would call it this way.... lnSaleNo = GetNextSaleNumber()
>
>Does this look ok? Should I do some error trapping in case something goes wroing ( a pc locks up during the function and LOCKS the sales_no table ) ??
>
>What else would you do?
>
>Thanks!

One thing that doesn't look ok, is when you fail to lock the table, you return -1

You should at least do a number of attemps to lock the table, imo
Gregory
Précédent
Suivant
Répondre
Fil
Voir

Click here to load this message in the networking platform