Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
Surrogate vs natural vs artificial, clustered vs non
Message
From
13/07/2014 12:45:29
 
 
General information
Forum:
Microsoft SQL Server
Category:
Indexing
Environment versions
SQL Server:
SQL Server 2014
Application:
Web
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
01603549
Message ID:
01603614
Views:
50
>>
>>Hi Kevin,
>>
>>Our app is a high-insert app. Is the performance gain from Hekaton as significant if the current DB (2008R2) fits in memory and is backed by SSD?
>
>Possibly, but can't say with 100% certainty.
>
>There is a tool you can download - AMR, from Microsoft. It will analyze and monitor/profile your database to see if it's a candidate for Hekaton.
>
>http://sqlmag.com/sql-server-2014/sql-server-2014-analysis-migrate-report-tool-amr
>
>One thing - I believe Hekaton is only available in the Enterprise version of 2014.
>
>Also - there are several T-SQL functions that can't be used when inserting rows into Hekaton tables (a big one is date functions). So you'd have to abstract out your stored proc inserts to receiving nothing but scalar variables that are pre-populated with the values you want.


Thank you Kevin. We run Enterprise, so that is not an issue. I will pass-on the info about AMR.
Previous
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform