>>No. Attempts to find a difference between taxation and confiscation are the exact definition of "distinction without a difference":
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distinction_without_a_differenceI'm not sure that "no confiscation without representation" carries the traditional meaning- but then, I'm not a sophist.
Seems to me that a society that has to rely on confiscation is a very sad society, whereas a society that has to rely on taxation is trying to set predictable costs of participation and tends to be a democracy- and I can think of no democracies whose peaceful running does not rely on predictable taxation rates. Not on confiscation- unless you have an example in mind. Needless to say, democracy is the worst form of government except for all the others that have been tried.
"... They ne'er cared for us
yet: suffer us to famish, and their store-houses
crammed with grain; make edicts for usury, to
support usurers; repeal daily any wholesome act
established against the rich, and provide more
piercing statutes daily, to chain up and restrain
the poor. If the wars eat us not up, they will; and
there's all the love they bear us."
-- Shakespeare: Coriolanus, Act 1, scene 1