>What is the purpose of this observation?
>Why is what Al Sharpton says or doesn't say even worth mentioning?
>How does that affect what happened to the victim and what will or won't happen to his alleged killers?
>I'm not challenging what you say. I don't have cable news on TV and the news feeds I get haven't mentioned him. If they had, I wouldn't have taken the time to read it.
>I just can't see how what a preacher from Brooklyn has to say about something that happened in MO is of any interest to anyone who seriously wants to know what happened here.
>Can you enlighten me?

Unless you subscribe to the theory that Sharpton might have played a role (however inadvertent) in Zimmerman being acquitted last summer in the Trayvon Marton case, my response probably wouldn't be of any interest to you.