>My point? "Reasonable" is always defined relative to your own position.
>
It doesn't have to be one's own financial position that drives a position though.
This fella and people like him are finally begin to understand what excessive wealth does:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/08/14/pope-francis-car-korea-_n_5677956.html


Whatever one's motive, that's why we have elections, courts, etc.
If things work well, and now and then they do, we come to a consensus on a definition of "reasonable" that will prevail until it is changed again.
Tamar and I are advocating one definition, you're advocating another.
Advocate away!
Meanwhile, I'll hand out pamphlets and sport bumper stickers for candidates who agree with my definition and I'm tickled silly to finally see a Pope, after all these years, who understands what his job REALLY is.