>>>>http://www.foxnews.com/on-air/fox-and-friends/blog/2014/08/21/missouri-cop-was-badly-beaten-shooting-michael-brown-says-source?intcmp=obnetwork
>>>>
>>>>Looks like there is more to this story than Al/Jessie want you to know....
>>>
>>>That certainly contradicts the autopsy that said Brown's body showed no signs of injury from a struggle. (http://www.cbsnews.com/news/michael-browns-autopsy-what-it-can-and-cant-tell-us/: "Nor were there signs of injuries on Brown's body from a struggle.")
>>>
>>>Tamar
>>
>>That link doesn't seem to work.
>
>Sorry. I tried to edit out the trailing garbage and apparently broke the link. Try this one:
>
>http://online.wsj.com/articles/independent-autopsy-shows-no-sign-of-struggle-in-michael-browns-shooting-1408381747
>
>
>>
>>What John's initial link stated, was the (supposed) medical report on the officer. There's some debate on whether the cop suffered a eye/orbital fracture.
>>
>
>Right, but the suggestion is that Brown beat Wilson badly, and the independent autopsy on Brown says no sign of a struggle.
>
>Tamar
>
>>As far the autopsy on Brown, I thought the only information released was the information on the # of times he was shot, and (supposedly) that he had some marijuana in his system.
>>
>>Those pieces of information don't necessarily contradict each other. If indeed the cop suffered an eye fracture, it could have been from a punch, or from some object, no idea for sure.

That's why we keep an open mind until the facts come out. Not the he said/she said....