Plateforme Level Extreme
Abonnement
Profil corporatif
Produits & Services
Support
Légal
English
Continuous integration
Message
De
02/09/2014 10:23:21
Mike Yearwood
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
 
 
À
02/09/2014 10:16:20
Information générale
Forum:
Visual FoxPro
Catégorie:
Classes - VCX
Versions des environnements
Visual FoxPro:
VFP 9 SP2
OS:
Windows 7
Network:
Windows 2008 Server
Database:
MS SQL Server
Application:
Desktop
Divers
Thread ID:
01599361
Message ID:
01606910
Vues:
100
>You assume that you will write code and check in without testing. Code should pass all unit tests locally before check in. Some tools, like TFS, can be configured with a gated check in. If unit tests don't pass, check in is prohibited.

Perhaps I did assume that a bit. :)

My point was - the developer would check out the spark plug module and iterate through a set of different designs, with many failing the unit test(s). I'm using it to get a picture in mind. So the spark plug would be checked out the entire time? What if another developer discovered that platinum was a better core? That discovery made it through tests and into the main line. Would CI involve trickling that back to the spark plug module dev?

>
>>Craig. I often believe the software world can learn from other industries. So using an engine as a mainline branch. A developer wishes to refine the spark plug. That takes months of iterative testing and discarding unworkable designs. Why should any of these unworkable ones reach the mainline branch?
Précédent
Suivant
Répondre
Fil
Voir

Click here to load this message in the networking platform