Beg your pardon. I value your voice on every technical aspect, but not if it comes to the priority of MS products. You are MS MVP.

For the FF IE stat: Apologies. My state was wrong as you pointed out. Normaly search is within the last year, so I have not checked the year just targeted the table,

For the NSA we disagree. I think they act like a big backup - I only need to figure out how to restore. I even would pay them the service. ;)

At least we agree on Chrome. :) The only problem on google is where to find a good competitor that runs on a payed base and does not spy on you.

Lutz

>Said like someone who hasn't kept up with IE improvements. I use IE11 as my primary browser and have zero issues. The developer tools are as good or better than Firebug or Chrome.
>
>What Google spies on is far, far worse than any other company. Even the NSA here in the US intrudes less.
>
>Finally, using five year old browser comparisons (the link you posted) is not valid. Every browser has had several updates since then.
>
>>It's just for Michel, so he knows what goes and what not.
>>
>>IE? Shudder. One would create a site so that it runs on most used browsers best?
>>
>>Respecting this http://www.foxload.com/mozilla-firefox-vs-internet-explorer-der-vergleich/, only support for FF and IE. Anything else violates the 80/20 rule.
>>
>>I can not go around OS, Office and VFP. But not one M$ product more. While google just spies on me, M$ spies and charges me - thats to much. :)