>Hi Richard,
>
>The proof being in the pudding, try
>
>
>i= 0
>
>do recurse
>
>procedure recurse
>i= i+1
>? i
>do recurse
>
>
>
>
>On my station it showed 126 before it went south.
Good test. I believe the stack is 128, give 1 or 2 for overhead, so your result makes sense...
The Anonymous Bureaucrat,
and frankly, quite content not to be
a member of either major US political party.
