>>Everybody can have their own assessment. My personal view is that the doctor was arrogant - an attempt to flaunt to the world the (very low) transmission factor of the virus.

No symptoms = no virus in blood = ZERO PERCENT transmission rate. Not low: non-existent.

So it depends whether you believe he had symptoms on the day he took the train. The MSM says the symptoms began the next day with a fever. Presumably none of us has had Ebola so we don't know whether it is credible that you just wake up one day with a fever, without any prior fatigue or other symptoms. He had complained of sluggishness since the previous day: if those sound like symptoms of a viral illness then he could have had virus in body fluids when he rode the train. At which point it depends whether he was bleeding, drooling or shedding body fluids by other means.

What I don't like is the statement that he "tried" to self-isolate. What do they mean by "tried?" You don't need to be a physician to know that self-isolation doesn't include going bowling, eating out and riding the New York train. However, it's the only story we have.