>>I was not personally offended. I was, however, astonished (but honestly not that surprised) to find such language in his post on this site.
>
>I was too. I figured I would hit send, and then there'd be a little message about language, and I'd chuckle a bit, and then post the censored version. Guess not.

That feature was silently removed years ago. So I gradually let go of my censored version of language, where I had words like "stool", "deurinated" (as opposite of "adurinated") and "know" (ah, when one has to resort to biblical language and it doesn't feel like a resort at all).