>>>>>True, but those methods are one or more orders of magnitude more difficult. Definitely not script-kiddie stuff.
>>>>
>>>>That is true, for the moment at least, but kids learn fast nowadays..
>>>
>>>Things like those sideband emissions attacks typically require sophisticated electronics equipment, which can't simply be downloaded.
>>
>>And then the signal is weak, I'd guess, so some shielding of the cable and the case would require much more sensitive equipment? Also, how does that work on laptops, the signal can be even weaker and the cable is twenty times shorter - less of an antenna, I'd say.
>>
>>Just curious to check my guesswork. My knowledge of electronics is riddled with holes, so I'd just like to stop some of them.
>
>Well, after we have learned about Iridium and how they get information out of the noise I would be more paranoic. Weak signals are a matter of math rather then of amplifying. And the flanks of digital signals are nice.
>
>By the high frequencies used in the comp and there digital nature (what ends up with even higher frequencies, look up fourier transform on rectangular function) shielding is very tricky. One CD tray out of plastic or a badly connected socket is enough. Cooling fans are a problem too.

That's why God invented tinfoil ;-)