>>>>>>Do you remember when there were actual, for real defensemen (Doug Harvey, Allan Stanley, Dick Duff, J.C. Tremblay to name a few) and scoring 20 goals in a season really meant something?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Maybe if I hadn't grown up through the six team era, I might feel different, but I did. When I try to watch now, I see players being called 'great' who would have had trouble making the farm clubs back then.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>I can't speak for the 60's but I started watching the NHL heavily around 1975. That was about 8 years after the first expansion. I've collected many tapes from Flyer, Montreal, and Ranger games in that era. I have a DVD of Reggie Leach's 5 goals against Boston in Game 5 of the conference finals in 1976. As a Flyer fan, there have been a million great moments at the Spectrum.
>>>>>
>>>>> And as much as I loved the game back then, I have to say that the skill and athleticism today are unbelievable. I'll take two players in particular because I try to watch them as much as I can...Ryan Getzlaf and Cory Perry of Anaheim. They have great speed and power and they are snipers as shooters. Whether they'd perform even better in the 1960's....or if Bobby Orr would be as amazing today as he was decades ago, difficult to say.
>>>>>
>>>>>I loved hockey in the 70's when the Broad Street Bullies did the impossible (and people forget that they DID have talent). Then you had the Habs and Guy Lafleur and their run....then the nearly perfect machine of the Islanders....then Gretzky....then Mario....then the almost rise of the Legion of Doom....then the re-birth of Hockey Town with Detroit's cups...then the hated Devils and their cups (god, how I hate the Devils!!!). But I have to say this....the two most impressive post-season runs I've EVER seen were the LA Kings in 2012 and then last spring. When that team decides to turn on the juice, they are relentless in ways I never imagined.
>>>>>
>>>>>So while I sometimes get concerned about the quality of play in other sports (like the NBA, though hopefully that little miracle in Golden State right now is a sign of better times for the sport), IMHO the NHL just gets better and better with each era.Agreed about both the NHL and NBA.
>>>>
>>>>One thing that the 6 teams zealots may miss is that back then practically all the players were Canadian. Not that there's anything wrong with that; they invented the game, after all. Now there are great players from all over the place.
>>
>>>
>>>I don't know if I'm a zealot or not, and I don't really care where the players are from, but think of it this way; how many players are in the league right now? In a six team league, the vast majority of them wouldn't be able to make it onto a team. Do you honestly believe the game quality would not be improved if he best players were spread out over only six teams instead of thirty?
>>
>>No. But that isn't what I said. I don't remember seeing any players in the current NHL who caused me to say "What's that bum doing here?" The other benefit as I see it is that now a lot more cities have teams, with fervent fan bases.
>
>Agreed. But I contend that the reason why you don't see players that you feel shouldn't be playing, is because they all really do belong. They are certainly good enough to play in a 30 team league. My contention has always been that when you take the best 150 or so players, spread them out over 6 teams and that's your league, you will have a far higher quality of hockey. That's what I grew up with, and that's why I don't see the kind of quality in the league that makes me interested in watching. I'm not saying that the players playing now don't belong; I'm saying the vast majority of them would not have made it in the old 6 team league, so I feel that when I watch, I'm seeing low quality hockey - at least compared with what I grew up watching.

So would your ideal NHL consist of two teams? ;-)