>>>>Oh so close:
>>>>
>>>>http://www.planetary.org/blogs/jason-davis/2015/20140116-falcon9-rapid-unscheduled-disassembly.html
>>>>http://www.businessinsider.com/spacex-problem-falcon9-crash-landing-2015-1
>>>>
>>>>They claim they know what went wrong, and that they've already fixed it.
>>>>
>>>>I'm starting to be impressed by these guys...
>>>
>>>Amazing that the landing platform sustained so little damage.....
>>
>>From the pics I saw, there isn't much on the platform that could be damaged. Also it seems there wasn't much fuel left in the stage (in a perfect world there would be none) so the explosion wasn't as big as it could have been.
>>
>>That said, explosions are funny things - I was taught that the forces generated usually follow the path of greatest resistance, which is a bit counterintuitive.
>
>I guess that explains the typical 'safe-blower' scenario in movies where they simply stick a lump of plastic explosive on a big steel door and it blows the door off....
>
In movies they area also used to bash a person from top - behind on the skull. The person pass out and stand up again.
This is wrong. If you pass out on that out you will never stand up, because the skull is broken. If not broken you will not pass out. It needs a sideward / front - upward bash to this effect ...