>Or at least it will shortly:
>
>http://www.theguardian.com/business/2015/jan/19/global-wealth-oxfam-inequality-davos-economic-summit-switzerland
>
>The study also says that the world's 80 wealthiest people own more than the poorest 50% of the world.The study points to the increase of inherited wealth (over a third of the Forbes-listed billionaires inherited) with recipients using their wealth to lobby for further advantage, e.g. $550M used to lobby Washington and EU bureaucrats in 2013.
>
>Karl Marx may have been wrong about the timing of wealth concentration, but these levels are heading back to 19th century levels that resulted in sudden vigorous change, usually involving the 1% being "assisted" to share the wealth.

Actually there's a virtually wealth. Think about you're Bill Gates. You have 100 billion of (I don't know actual pays) MS stocks. You decided to buy wheat for Africans. You sell your stocks. Value of one stock is 10$. In first step it will be 9$,8$... At last after sell all stocks you have 40 billion of cash...
A ton of wheat costs 100$, You beginned buy wheats and than at last it will be 1.000$.

%1 needs live with safetly in their luxury life. For that you have to eat good, wear good so you can work for them and not hate them, you don't a threat for them, because you're happy with your little wealty. For your little wealth Africans should be starve...

Actually we're living in Matrix. Tons of wheat just cost a MS Office license. That's crazy...