>>>>http://fee.org/freeman/detail/youll-never-guess-whos-trying-to-hack-your-iphone
>>>>
>>>>Don't like the Fourth Amendment ?? No problem - just have the DOJ change the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure ...and bye bye to the 4th Amendment !! Rather disturbing as we use VPN connections here to connect to our office network.
>>>
>>>We didn't need it. The 4th amendment was superfluous. What were the founders thinking? Modern Republicans know better.
>>>
>>>OK, I will stop being sarcastic. It's not a simple issue. Where is the line between liberty and security?
>>
>>So long as you frame the issue in terms of liberty vs. security you are already losing.
>
>How would you phrase it, then? I didn't say we can't have both. It's just which one takes precedence when they intersect.

It's not a matter of "phrasing". It's a matter of framing. You have already bought into the BS line that it is a choice between security and liberty. This is a false dichotomy sold to the people by the politician. John Baird has it essentially correct (without the left-wing comment).