>Thierry, re VFP Compiler:
>
>>>- did you notice a difference in performance / execution time?
>
>No visible performance difference. Theoretically the deep obfuscation/decomposition could make a difference in complex expressions in tight loops. The author says that simple expressions can be quicker since some interpreter overhead is eliminated.
>
>Interestingly, you can inline C++ or Assembly right into your VFP prg files and it gets inlined into the dll which is extremely efficient

around W2K this would have been maaarvelous for me o a large project
Is the API to access vfp variables/data fields and call app functions identical to the one needed in flls?