Plateforme Level Extreme
Abonnement
Profil corporatif
Produits & Services
Support
Légal
English
Natural Keys
Message
De
02/03/2015 10:33:14
 
 
À
02/03/2015 08:30:32
Timothy Bryan
Sharpline Consultants
Conroe, Texas, États-Unis
Information générale
Forum:
Microsoft SQL Server
Catégorie:
Conception bases de données
Titre:
Versions des environnements
SQL Server:
SQL Server 2012
Application:
Web
Divers
Thread ID:
01616073
Message ID:
01616086
Vues:
48
>Here at my job we have a database modeler in our group. He is insistent that all tables use 'Natural Keys' and not surrogate keys. I am not trying to start a battle or anything, but is this really even still a debate? It does not matter how much logical reason I provide him, he is propagating his plan across the company and it does not seem to matter what the impact will be. This is a global company in 140 countries with data centers all over the world.
>
>My only questions is: Has something changed and I missed it? We are talking about values that users see and will want to change being used as primary keys on the tables.

My two cents -

For OLTP applications, I prefer surrogate keys over natural keys.

For Data Warehouse/Business Intelligence databases, then ABSOLUTELY use surrogate keys.


As for whether to use integer values or GUIDs for a surrogate....depends on whether you need global uniqueness across domains/servers. If so, then a GUID is the way to go. But if you only need uniqueness within the database, the SQL 2012 Sequence Object (sort of a little integer factory generator) is a good way to go.
Précédent
Répondre
Fil
Voir

Click here to load this message in the networking platform