>>>We do a trial now. Berlin seems to be a hot spot.
>
>LOL, but that's not a trial somebody could have mounted on purpose. ;-)

Let's hope it. It spread out from some refugees through there supporters (Why do I fit them automaticaly with alternative medicine? Must be a bad habbit ...).
>
>>>Cervical Cancer is to be read as cancer of uterine orifice? Well, if this is not blocking the cancer at least it blocks a superfluous virus. But this must be in front of any sexual contact, so it's a bit late for me. :) But kids go as soons as insurance pays. Friend of mine got this cancer and is now happy to be on surrogate hormones ...
>
>Good. Meanwhile there is strong noise from the UK that breast screening can do more harm than good. This is the problem: even if technically possible, it's not decent to conduct trials on such things involving humans, so the only way to discover is when contrary evidence is discovered the hard way.

X rays like radioctivity is a probability. More exposition - greater risk. To be counted on a lifespan. Basic math. We get neutral lessons on that. Nobody was mentioning the big piles from the uranium mines nearby But it's not that tricky to count one and one.

But in the end this is all superflous. Somebody come up last time, that the biggest influence in cancer is - chance. One of the four neutrinos that hit during your lifespan is enough.