Environment versions
Network:
Windows 2008 Server
>>>One of the "it almost happened but didn't moments" was in the late 1980's when Borland was seriously looking at a Turbo dBase to complement their Turbo product line. But Phil K just didn't think there was enough justification - he though client-server would have more emphasis.
>>
>>Turbo Pascal's compiler was fantastic. Turbo Dbase would be interesting...
>
>Turbo Pascal and Turbo C were outstanding products. Microsoft C might have had a few more optimization tricks up its sleeve, but Turbo C was overall a better crafted product.
>
>By late 1989 the PC world had 2 stellar five star products - Turbo C and FoxPro 1.0. As much as I love SQL Server, I would say those 2 products , with respect to their era, were the greatest software releases we've seen.
I used Foxpro 1.0 once and it was very very slow. After your words I think it might be about low system resources. After first try, I returned to Foxbase. Than bought Foxpro 2.5. Foxpro 2.5 also was a disaster until with an accident run it a 4 MB ram pc. It was fantastic. Everyone was shocked with 32 bit Foxpro. My clipper developer friends too. They were using clipper just because of it's .EXE compiler, I wasn't. Because Foxbase had an IDE and very faster than Clipper.
Old days was very easy. I was at a training about Azure at Microsoft today. It's very complex. I just thougt Azure as a server center at internet... :(
Previous
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only