>>http://www.engadget.com/2015/03/19/49-state-legal-personal-flamethrower/?ncid=rss_truncated
>>
>>Really? Geeeze
>
>Flame throwers don't burn people to a crisp, people burn people to a crisp ;)
>
>At least it runs on regular gas, doesn't need premium ;)

Right - but I'm sure there will be hacks for it - ya know like to run on jet fuel and toss 100ft flames instead of 25ft flames.

Seriously though - why is California the only state not allowing them? You'd think it would be 1 to 49.... not 49 to 1.