Plateforme Level Extreme
Abonnement
Profil corporatif
Produits & Services
Support
Légal
English
Any alternate to Molebox?
Message
De
08/04/2015 06:42:28
Metin Emre
Ozcom Bilgisayar Ltd.
Istanbul, Turquie
 
 
À
08/04/2015 06:01:09
John Ryan
Captain-Cooker Appreciation Society
Taumata Whakatangi ..., Nouvelle Zélande
Information générale
Forum:
Visual FoxPro
Catégorie:
Produits tierce partie
Versions des environnements
Visual FoxPro:
VFP 9 SP2
OS:
Windows Server 2012
Network:
Windows 2008 Server
Database:
MS SQL Server
Application:
Web
Divers
Thread ID:
01617916
Message ID:
01618007
Vues:
58
>>>Tried as admin with no success, but actually it was working without admin rights before 8.1.
>
>OK, it could be a Molebox versioning issue but as per previous, Molebox is ineffectual protection for a VFP app anyway. Have you considered Defox or VFP Compiler? The protected product can be installed by xcopying a handful of files to a folder on the destination machine and they're both far too difficult to hack even for the sorts of C++/VFP guru who can disassemble the ASM or C++ to figure out what is happening.

We have hundreds of customers, so I can't trust VFP C++ compiler at this time.I just wait for others to test... :)
Maybe Defox + another .EXE, DLL wrapper would be a better solution. What about Refox on Defox protected files?

>No matter what protection you use, watch out for use of external encryption dlls. If you rely on one of those, your encryption keys can be hooked from a VFP app the moment you access the dll, without bothering to decompile the rest of the app.

I add dll files too into Molebox wrapper. Isn't that a good protection?
Précédent
Suivant
Répondre
Fil
Voir

Click here to load this message in the networking platform