>>>It was miraculous - they always seemed to conclude that she needed the exact amount of a therapy that her insurance would pay for, and not an iota more or less.
>Is that a coincidence.. hmm?
>
>We've had this discussion before. Does insurance agree to pay for a level of care that is declared reasonable by their experts- or is it an inflated target for greedies to aim at? If you go for the second explanation: why?
>
Wow- you could have been an NFL running back - you do your best to avoid the opposition.
You ignored the point. It's statistically impossible that the exact therapies they said my wife needed - number of days, number of treatments, number of cc's, number of gadgets, etc were exactly what her insurance would pay for- never more or less.
It happened at least a dozen times to my wife and my fellow seniors are having the same experience.
There's only one logical explanation - they are prescribing based on ability to pay.
If it looks like a rubber duck....