Plateforme Level Extreme
Abonnement
Profil corporatif
Produits & Services
Support
Légal
English
New Alzheimer’s treatment restores memory
Message
De
17/04/2015 01:16:25
John Ryan
Captain-Cooker Appreciation Society
Taumata Whakatangi ..., Nouvelle Zélande
 
 
À
16/04/2015 20:29:08
Information générale
Forum:
Science & Medicine
Catégorie:
Autre
Divers
Thread ID:
01617925
Message ID:
01618584
Vues:
42
Bill,

Here's a sample local coverage determination for earwax removal:

http://www.mediquant.com/policy/L33945_20151001.pdf

Note that there are guidelines as to when a physician's skill is needed rather than a nurse or technician, but also see this:

>>It is recognized that audiologists' education, experience or practice may include or require techniques of cerumen removal. However, Medicare can pay audiologists only for medically necessary diagnostic testing, which is considered to include any incidental cerumen removal by the audiologist. Medicare cannot reimburse audiologists for CPT code 69210 or HCPCS code G0268 under any circumstances.

In other words, the audiologist does not get paid a bean extra for performing earwax extraction. You blame physicians for this, but it's a Medicare policy. On the same topic- physicians can't claim extra above their standard E/M fee unless certain criteria are met. Certainly "routine" earwax extraction would not be regarded by Medicare as meeting the criteria.
"... They ne'er cared for us
yet: suffer us to famish, and their store-houses
crammed with grain; make edicts for usury, to
support usurers; repeal daily any wholesome act
established against the rich, and provide more
piercing statutes daily, to chain up and restrain
the poor. If the wars eat us not up, they will; and
there's all the love they bear us.
"
-- Shakespeare: Coriolanus, Act 1, scene 1
Précédent
Suivant
Répondre
Fil
Voir

Click here to load this message in the networking platform