>>>Not that bad.
>>
>>does this mean 'excellent'?
>>
>>to me, that's what GoFish deserves.
>
>I'm not that deep into it. I've done simple tests, found nothing I've not done with Code Reference at first glance. There are other information return and a different way to select extendsions, but then I'm comfortable with strings.
>Possibly this is I'm not mouse addicted. The whole opposite seems true, this feels hard for keyboard navigation. To tab through all those checkboxes, what a pain. Sometimes there are keyboard shortcuts, sometime are not. Tab order confused.
>
>But than I've crashed into 4/17/2015 and PI =3.1415, storage to drive C:, one setting for all projects. No exception. Decimal comma. I do stuff parallel and I realy like the way Code Refernece has a history for every project. Date is DMY time is 24 hours. While I'm in general comfortable with english forms this will not happen.
>
>For the moment it's a no go. And I see no need to hack me into it.
>
>But again, this is only my POV. I've only give it a try because others seems to realy like it.
>I'm procrastinating the next job. I should just focus more on that.
>:)

FWIW, when I first started using GoFish, I was bothered by its lack of history, but when I realized I could run many searches in the time Code References took to run one, and that GoFish would remember what I'd search, just not the results, I got over it pretty fast.

Tamar