>>Looks loke I need to apologize.
>>
>>criticism > silence > not that bad
>>
>>So please read original message as outstanding
>>
>>I rarely praise.
>>
>>Why I do not digg into it? Because I'm into FoxBin2Prg, PDM, fixed my problems in Code Reference ages ago, and in general I should finally start those job I'm pretending to prepare the last weeks.
>>
>>And, I don't like to fork existing tools without need. It is your work, what I value, and in my mind it belongs to you. I will touch it only if I focus a real problem and you would be reluctant to solve it.
>>
>>I think I have expressed in this thread that balancing need to use this tool vs effort to change (myself) I came to the conclusion that I do not need it.
>>I had no need from start since Code Reference runs pretty cool for me (I've just checked because a lot of people seems to like it), so the bennefits I saw do not outweight my problems.
>>
>>It was all about: Is there a quick way to come about my problems. If yes fine, I will look later again, if no, fine, no harm done.
>>
>>Possibly you all got me wrong from the start, by my initial sentence, so I will forgive the do-it-yourself statements.
>>
>>:)
>
>No, don't mistake my silence as any form of aggravation. I've been best on converting my FoxPro app to use Sql Server, and I spent the afternoon focused on that, even though I did read your comment. No offense taken. I get it. You wish/need other features. No problem.
>
>I've created and used many community tools, and I know how this game work. I'm not offended at all. I understand the tendency to ask for changes in a tool and expect the developer will just do them. We often assume they can just bang it out because it seems like a small requires. I've done it before myself... Just ask Jim Nelson, Tamar, Rick Schummer, Doug, Rick Strahl, Tore, Paul, Eric, Rick Borup, etc.... We all do it. No problem.

Had -> table

The message was about myself. Just to explain that I'm not very fast with excellent / outstanding or the likes.

I'm comfortable

And my questions are of two types.

-Major breech -> need fast change.
-I see akwardness / I see a way to improve / I need a feature. -- put it on the wish list,ignore it, ask for contribution (multiple ways of that.), ...

This was all second type, something I brought to you attention.

A request must not be granted. If it is an order we will talk money.

This was not even a request. It was a question for ways and chances.

You gave an answer. I got all I'm asked.

:)