>>Yep, and the answer is that there's a difference between who someone is, and someone's behavior. I can refuse to do business with a company that does something I consider reprehensible; that's not the same as refusing to do business with someone because of their sex or religion or race (or, in my view, sexual orientation). For example, I would not work for a tobacco company; I think what they do is nearly criminal.
>>
>Were you the proverbial pizza shop owner should you be allowed to refuse to provide pizza for the executive briefings of that tobacco company?
>Or to a meeting of the local skinheads?
>
>If you claim that right for yourself, it is inconsistent for you to deny that right to people who believe that homosexual behavior is equally reprehensible.
>
>It doesn't matter if you think they are right or not. It doesn't matter if I think they are right or not. By claiming the right to act on my/your own moral beliefs I/you must conceed the right to others to act on their own moral beliefs. Failure to do so makes you/me the despot and bigot.

Perfect reply. You said it better than I could.