>>>>
>>>>I agree about the evolution question. That's a good indicator.
>>>
>>>Not necessarily. A person can hold one set of beliefs without them affecting their views on public policy. I am not going to drop the context of Democrats who personally oppose abortion and even work with charities that work against abortion (like Nancy Pelosi and Joe Biden) - and yet support Roe v Wade.
>>>
>>>Using what you described as an indicator in itself is VERY questionable and opens up many cans of works (with both parties).
>>>
>>>Once again, it is the wrong question.
>>
>>Why is a person's view on evolution not a good indicator?
>>If someone own personal reasons.
>>
>
>3 questions then...
>
>What's your view on man-made global warming?
>Is man-made climate change a "settled science"? Do you agree with the position of the current administration, and that it's the greatest national security threat?
>What is a valid baseline methodology for capturing and recording temperature measurements?

I wish that I could answer all those, but I frankly don't have a clue about any of them, including what the administration thinks about them.

On the other hand, there is lots of data about how different species have evolved and more comes on stream daily. If I were to tell my grandsons - one a senior and one a junior in high school- both have been taking AP science since they started - that I doubted the notion of evolution, they'd roast me alive.
When I was in high school, there was a lively debate on the subject, but except for some diehard school districts, most people accept it now.
Hence, my reply to Tamar.
If someone doubts the notion of evolution, I wonder about that person's judgment.