>>If someone doubts the notion of evolution, I wonder about that person's judgment.
>
>There are a number of scientists who are gravitating towards new versions of intelligent design.
>
>I am not saying I agree with them - just because the mathematical odds of the universe are now computed to be even higher than previously thought doesn't invalidate evolution - but there are doubters with advanced degrees in the hard science/math fields.

So.. I agree that the climate change evidence is thin
However, here's the problem
The evidence on tobacco was thin for a long time and I have borderline emphysema and have about 50% of the lung capacity I should have at my age.
The evidence on asbestos was thin and people are dead...
The evidence on lead was thin and people are dead...
The evidence on mercury was thin and people are dead...
If the climate change people are right, we all fry...if they're wrong... so what?