>>>but hey market is (and will always be) there.
>>
>>Yep, the market is literally self-propagating. Speaking statistically, if enough women find such augmentations attractive, then those men's genes will, on average, be passed along more often.
>
>That's if you assume that they still have multiplication in mind at the time they start applying these enhancements.

Doesn't matter if they do or don't - beauty is in the eye of the beholder, not the augmenter.

>A likewise flimsy statistical expectation is that of the women becoming prevalent in the academic area in the US by sheer IQ, because they had to use their brains to get there, whereas the males got there, in a statistically significant percentage, by being good at sports.

Based on recent trends, not sure how that theory would even arise:

- College sports programs are more extensive and better funded than ever, yet

- North American college enrollment is currently very close to 60% female. This is arguably a tragedy in slow motion, and not just for that fraction of coeds whose goal is to get their MRS. Efforts are already under way to improve the outcomes of boys in the public school system.