>>Has Fox News, in fact, become the first primary state by limiting the debate field?
>
>They're limiting it to the top 10, so in a way I suppose they are - but at the same time I don't think it would be too practical to try to hold a debate with 16 or 17 participants either.
>
>>I'm one of the millions who can't afford (or choose not to pay for) Fox News so I'll have to read about it the next day.
>
>I think the debates are being broadcast on C-SPAN too aren't they??
>

I don't have CSPAN either.
I'm REALLY cheap!
I can probably find some streaming somewhere but as a matter of principle I refuse to pay for garbage and this "debate" will be a contest between heaps of garbage.
Unfortunately, the dem side is just as bad as of now.