>>The most annoying thing about that is hearing people say Bill will really be president of Hillary wins. Of course most of the folks I hear say that also think Trump is great and global warming is fake haha...
>
>On the "global warming is fake".....here's a quite from Britain's Daily Mail, which actually bothered to do some research:
>
>
>"the NASA press release failed to mention…that the alleged ‘record’ amounted to an increase over 2010, the previous ‘warmest year’, of just two-hundredths of a degree—or 0.02C. The margin of error is said by scientists to be approximately 0.1C—several times as much."
>
>Think about that....the allegation that 2014 was the hottest year on record, and yet the margin for error exceeds the alleged increase by roughly 5 TIMES!!!
>
>Victor, the problem with the claim of global warming (and man-made climate change) is really very simple - and I challenge anyone here to dispute what I'm about to say. Climate forecasting does not have a good track record of making any type of accurate long-term predictions. The point of forecasting is really quite simple - to demonstrate some level of directional accuracy BEFORE the data comes in. That hasn't happened.
>
>Additionally, the temperature measurements have been a series of embarrassments for the climate change activists. I'll be more than happy to provide several links on this. Bottom line, the climate change people are guilty of wanting people to believe that temperatures largely stayed constant for thousands of years (when direct measurements weren't being taken) and suddenly started changing the 1970's when people starting paying closer attention. That's disingenuous at best. Here is one link right now about what has been dubbed "improper mixing"
>
>http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2013/03/climate-change-endgame-in-sight.php
>
>Add to that, the very shaky data that man-made runaway greenhouse gases have any direct bearing on climate change. Right now a stronger theory in scientific circles is variations in solar radiation strength with the impact of fewer cosmic rays leading to fewer clouds to block out heat from the sun. This is obviously quite different than the political agendas being advanced for "man-made climate change"
>
>The science is definitely not 100% settled (contrary to what the president would like people to think). Right now, bottom line - there is no hard evidence in so-called "man-made climate change".

The science is 100% settled among scientist and climatologist. You should spend 10 minutes and watch this: http://thedailyshow.cc.com/videos/8q3nmm/burn-noticed It's really quite funny and shows hows the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology's brilliant minds at work on the subject.