>>I agree with the CDO approach. I used Sergey's code at
https://www.berezniker.com/content/pages/visual-foxpro/cdo-2000-class-sending-emails to get started. It looks like a lot of code, but really isn't, some of it illustrates the flexibility.
>>
>>I have one app using it on Server 2012 R2. It runs fine, nothing to install or configure, it's just there and it works.
>>
>>One drawback to the CDO approach is, since you're not automating Outlook, you don't automatically get a copy of sent messages in Outlook. But, you can save them in some other format elsewhere, or that may not be important to you.
>
>thanks for this link Al. We have a lot of email import to do at our end that requires organizing outlook folders and processing the emails collected programmatically.
>
>With that in mind, will CDO approach work for us??
For years we've been successfully using
Redemption for Outlook automation.
"The five senses obstruct or deform the apprehension of reality."
Jorge L. Borges?
"Premature optimization is the root of all evil in programming."
Donald Knuth, repeating C. A. R. Hoare
"To die for a religion is easier than to live it absolutely"
Jorge L. Borges