>>No, the term "climate change" was recommended by a Republican operative because it sounded less alarming than "global warming." It's been in use since well before 2013.
>>
>>Here's the 2002 memorandum in which Frank Luntz says "It’s time for us to start talking about “climate change”
>>instead of global warming and “conservation” instead of preservation."
>>
>>https://www2.bc.edu/~plater/Newpublicsite06/suppmats/02.6.pdf
>>
>
>Wow....you're quoting a Fox News talking head? :)

I'm quoting him to dispute the idea that the name was changed from "global warming" to "climate change" by people who wanted to act on the topic. Luntz proposed the change specifically because "climate change" sounded less frightening. (That's in the document I linked.)

>
>Ever watch Luntz conduct so-called spontaneous focus groups? Nearly everything about him on his show is contrived.
>
>
>Topic switch - do you still think the news on PP and StemExpress is "B.S.", given the more recent information?

I think everything about these edited videos is BS. Planned Parenthood wasn't doing anything wrong, other than some employees behaving cavalierly when talking about the topic. I'll be totally clear: I support the idea of using fetal tissue from abortions in research. It lets something good come from an unfortunate situation.

Tamar